Blogging PRWeb

  • PRWeb.com
  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Blogger Bios
  • Home

Vocus CEO Speaks Out on PRWeb News Release Service

November 29th, 2012
Tweet

Note:  The following post was written by Vocus CEO Rick Rudman (Twitter | bio).

At Vocus, we’ve always strived to deliver an online news distribution service that is unique and valuable to our customers, while also providing a reliable source of company-generated news for millions of readers.  Earlier this week we distributed what turned out to be a fraudulent news story and fell short on this promise.

We’re sorry for any frustration or embarrassment we caused to the people who rely on the news releases we distribute, and we’ve already made changes to do better going forward.

To those who have asked about our process and our safeguards, I can tell you that we do have both. Yes, an editor does review every single news release that gets submitted for distribution. They check a variety of factors related to content and sender authenticity, they have personal interactions with our customers via telephone and email, and they take additional precautions for releases that contain ticker symbols.  Obviously, the steps we took were not enough in this case. We also know there will always be disingenuous people out there who will attempt to circumvent these safeguards, which is why we constantly review and improve our process as we are doing right now.

In addition to news coverage on the fraudulent release, this incident set off a broader discussion about the purpose of company-generated content, its place in the online news world and the role of news distribution services like PRWeb.

Let me speak first as an entrepreneur who founded Vocus 20 years ago: Getting announcements and news about a company into the hands of interested consumers used to be very hard.  I was told back then that my announcements weren’t “newsworthy.”  As excited as I was about my new software release, the mainstream media wasn’t going to write a story about it.  My announcements were not picked up because of this reason or that reason.  But here’s what I did believe:  I had news about my company I wanted to share and I knew there were people out there who wanted to read it. I also knew that going through traditional channels was not the way to do it.

PRWeb exists to give businesses a way to get their announcements and news directly to the audience that most wants them.  I may not think that a Boston-based rare coin dealer has news for me, but they have news for someone.  I may not be interested in attending an event in Beverly Hills for a new plastic surgery procedure, but there are people who are. And of course, there are plenty of well-known larger companies delivering their news and announcements through PRWeb and into the hands of interested consumers, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Over the years, hundreds of thousands of companies have agreed with this premise.  PRWeb, which started as a small direct-to-consumer news release service, has become something much bigger, and now distributes more news releases than any other release service in the world.

We have done very well over the years with over one million releases sent.  Yes – with all the growth and all the great news releases, we’ve also distributed some not so great releases.  This is why we’re constantly reviewing our guidelines and editorial standards and why the events of the past few days have already sparked real changes, both human and software-driven within PRWeb that will further improve the quality of the news releases we distribute.

It’s clear that we have to hold our service to an ever-higher standard, so PRWeb will continue to evolve.  We will continue to deliver a service that’s valuable to our customers, valuable to our readers and valuable to our distribution and media partners – and we’ll work tirelessly to deliver on these promises.

Thank you for reading.

Rick Rudman
Chief Executive Officer
Vocus, Inc.


Subscribe to my feed

Filed under: Distribution by Frank Strong

  • gregwbrooks

    Spectacularly frustrating discussion about this yesterday among some colleagues — entirely too many of whom think there should be “some sort of ethical standard similar to what newsrooms use” (actual quote) for paid wire services.

    That’s ridiculous.

    The ultimate arbiter of whether content is genuine and valuable or not is the reader — whether it’s a content editor looking over a PRWeb feed in a newsroom or a member of the public reading their community paper. Smart content consumers are skeptical content consumers, and that’s been true ever since Oog wrote the first press release on a cave wall.

    If Vocus and PRWeb decide taking on some gatekeeping duties makes their product more valuable, then go for it. But we don’t need gatekeeping simply in response to content consumers who somehow believe every word they read on the web should be pre-vetted for accuracy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/diannebreseedavis Dianne Bresee Davis

    Thank you for how you are handling this. I hate what media has become in this country. Far larger organizations have been duped in the past. Welcome to a club that no one seeks membership in! All the bes!

  • Chuck Robbins

    Wow 1 or 2 errant uses of a terrific marketing tool and PRWeb/Vocus is suddenly terrible? Give me a break. Yes finally I don’t have to hire an SEO expert for thousands a month to help my clients make their way through the maze of Google, Bing and other search engine nonsense. I don’t have to painfully create link relationships that might change at the next algorithm revamp. I am a proud distributor of of the Vocus/PRWeb product. Maybe some of you have forgotten what it was like to send a news release 20 years ago. Finding media lists, stamping some crazy expensive promotional item to get the attention of a bored journalist. Now my small biz clients can do what only the big corporate clients could afford not so long ago. For every unhappy Blogger, I’ll show you 20 happy clients using the service.

    Thanks Vocus. Frank and Rick: Christmas presents can be forwarded to ….

  • Cheryl Lawson

    I too had a discussion about this on Twitter. A bit ironic. It seems some people are ready to throw out a great product because spammers figured a way to take advantage of it. We all know that isn’t a practical internet strategy.

    I have been the beneficiary of a few of those editorial department emails/phone calls informing me that my release needed more supporting evidence, or seemed too much like a blog post vs. a news announcement. The process has made me a much better PR writer and hopefully has helped people who are interested in my announcements share my news.

  • http://twitter.com/vocuschairman Vocus CEO – Rick

    I appreciate the perspective and recognition of the benefits of PRWeb when used properly. That being said, we will not shy away from two things we need to improve: 1. We have to make sure the senders are who they they they are. 2. We have to do a better job screening out spam, especially for our media partners that re-publish our news releases. We’ve already made meaningful changes in the last 72 hours with more to come in the coming weeks. Personally I’m excited about the changes which will make PRWeb even better.

  • http://www.facebook.com/j.s.cothill John Scott Cothill ?????

    The fact it became mainstream news shows that so called “journalists” in some circles aren’t worth 2 dimes! I don’t believe this is a PRWeb integrity issue (spam could still happen like this), it’s the very fact that some journalists obviously do not research.

    Happy PRWeb Customer.

  • http://twitter.com/KenyonHoag Chris Hoag

    The new safeguards PR Web put into place were badly implemented. A single pop up window announcing the need for new authorizations is not sufficient. If a release has unfulfilled submission requirements it would be helpful for clients to be notified in a timely manner. In my case, ANY notification would have been helpful. I had to call to find out multiple authorizations were needed.

    I understand the need for safeguards. PR Web has to understand that a knee jerk reaction to getting burned may result in unfortunate consequences for long term customers.

  • http://www.prweb.com/ Stacey Acevero

    Hi Chris, we really appreciate that feedback and will absolutely take it into consideration.

« Press Release Hooks: How to Write Catchy Subjects, Headlines and Leads 3 Things You Shouldn’t Include in Your Press Release »
  • Search Blogging PRWeb


  • Subscribe via E-mail

    Enter your email address:

  • Subscribe via RSS

    Subscribe to Blogging PRWeb's Feed
  •   
  • Vocus SM Strategy App

  • Recent Posts

    • The HARO Limelight Series (HLS)- Danny Kofke, Source
    • Six Ways to Strengthen Your Story Pitch
    • Plan Ahead for Summer Marketing
    • The HARO Limelight Series (HLS)- Kate Hennessy, Reporter
    • Optimize for Local Search on Mobile
  • Learning Center Resources

    What is a Press Release?

    Grade your Press Release

    How to Write a Successful News Release

    Press Release Templates

    How to Format a News Release

    Social Media Survival Kit

  • Blogroll

    • Daily Dose (Entrepreneur)
    • Denise O'Berry
    • Duct Tape Marketing
    • inVocus Media Research Team
    • John Battelle's Searchblog
    • Journalistics
    • Liz Strauss
    • New Influencer
    • Online Marketing Blog
    • Online PR Book
    • PR Breakfast Club
    • PRWeb
    • PRWeb Learning Center
    • Search Engine Land
    • Small Business Television
    • Small Business Trends
    • The Publicity Hound
    • Vocus
    • Vocus Blog
    • Web Ink Now

© Copyright 1997-2013, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC. Vocus, PRWeb and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.